How could anyone already know how to explain why atoms behave as they do between the years 1910 and 1920, when the neutron--something inextricably critical to the contents of atom nuclei--wasn't discovered until 1932? To show just how bad this can get, the subatomic particle now called a neutron, was named as such because of that faulty system (with its negative charge that does not exist) devised over a decade before the critical particle was discovered. So the particle was named neutron because it was decided, again based on that faulty system, that it was neutrally charged because they had no other way to explain why electrons are attracted to nuclei except by a positive-to-negative relationship experienced between protons and electrons. Therefore, others went on to elaborately build upon that faulty system and most everyone everywhere now assumes that it is perfectly correct. The logical reasoning skills of the general public have been turned off, at least relative to physics, by so many counterintuitive quantum system explanations. It's a joy just to know that everything actually makes good sense--a reward in and of itself.
Making Things as Realistic as Possible Instead of Just Easier to Use
However, this system will become far easier to use once all of the leading nuclei (with all accompanying shells) of each element have been configured since everything here is intuitive, which makes it completely understandable as well as philosophically satisfying; while a flood of counterintuitive nonsense should finally shrink and eventually go away.
Ever since religions were formed some have gotten away with philosophical murder, so to speak. For that last ten decades or so the physics system that emerged has done essentially the same thing with its negative charge, antimatter, warped space, particles going into and out of existence, massless waves (all while, for example, sound waves don't exist in the vacuum of space), gravity wells, gravitons, anions and cations (that in order to believe in ions you must ignore the meaning and implication of cloud chamber observations) and jelly-like nuclei that don't take on specific configurations for each element. It's been like the magicians of religion all over again: essentially the equivalent of alleged miracle workers (tricksters) who have done things only to impress others and make a buck anyway they can. Yet I don't consider all modern particle scientists as having been like that, thank goodness; such as Ernest Rutherford and James Chadwick.
Now Featured on the front side of the Sixth Installment chart: David Attenborough (my all-time favorite naturalist) in a BBC Earth program produced in excess of ten years ago--when he passed along what he had been told to say by quantum physicists, he said that bees and flowers have a negative-to-positive electric charge rela-tionship that causes any flower's pollen to jump onto a bee. But that pollen jumping onto a bee isn't at all caused by any negative-positive relationship, but rather by the simple dynamics of pith ball type static electric attraction (while less frequently repel will occur as well) as explained just to the left on this Sixth Installment chart. For like how a balloon sticks to a wall after being rubbed by a loosely woven fairly rough cloth (or when using fur instead), the extremely fast movements of the bee's wings disturbs the outer shells of the atoms and/or molecules in those wings, which movement also disturbs many outer shells on the hair that covers the bee's body. Even so, its wing and body hair atoms/molecules will lose many of their outer shell particles by way of that disturbance so that temporary replacement electric photons will rush in to fill the electromagnetic void created by such losses. As explained to the left on this chart, this temporary particle transition causes the pollen to jump onto the bee's body in much the same way that a wall becomes attractive to a balloon that has been sufficiently disturbed.
%201600%20resolution.jpg/:/)
The current US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee (whom I usually don't said that today's Israeli settlers are terrorists. Israeli settlers are trying to take back Palestinian land and using violence while they try to do that. Israeli settlers think that the land is theirs by divine right. But their religion has deceived them just like it deceived Jesus.
The previous Side One of the Fourth Installment--a picture of a large atom before I delved into configuring any that were the larger type--has been retired. In its place will be a new chart about Acids and Bases.
This system explains how and why light is bent to produce magnification, especially direct sunlight. Direct sunlight is a profuse flow of incoming particles with many of those being lines of single photons. Most of the photons in that light have mild mutual repel while some are a good bit more ambivalent. All electrons (all of which are significantly sized composite particles) including all of the smaller radio units--as both kinds form various shells around nuclei depending upon a nucleus' size--have mutually repelling photons on their surfaces that stopped them from adding more mass when those formed. So much of the incoming sunlight passes through those shells, which mutual repel between those shells and the incoming light photons compresses those as those pass though or between those. That compression and the repel reaction to it makes those photons spread out much more as those exit the compression area which results in magnification. Such traveling photons of light are not compressed when those run into gas atoms and molecules because those gases are not fixed and are always moving and reacting to various flows of many things.
Good sleep is the only heaven you will ever know. Quit thinking that you can live forever after you die, which is only a way for religions to scam money from you.
Protium through Scandium Configured; Water Molecule,
Atmospheric Nitrogen and Oxygen and Various Explanations
Protium through Scandium Configured; West Side View (also East)
Condensed Mass Volume, Shell Mass Volume, Total Atom Volume, In Depth Attraction Aggregate Explanation
Gravity is constantly demonstrated for us on Earth in these everyday and quite ordinary ways. Water makes a droplet because the leftover attraction from its small molecules mildly reaches out reciprocally to join together several water molecules so that they clump together. The same sort of thing happens to cause water vapor to form clouds instead of them remaining diffused and separate in the atmosphere. Also, cooling water molecules make their electron shells contract which makes the their leftover reciprocal attraction stronger since the space between the involved nuclei, molecule to molecule, is reduced by that; even as they so often condense together on the side of a cold object and/or turn into attached frost if the temperature is cold enough.
An elastic material like a rubber band also exhibits gravity. In that case the joined molecules making the solid material are joined together too tightly to behave as a liquid; while the attraction between each of them isn't strong enough to form a rigid solid. Thus they can be pulled apart and stretched while they attempt to keep holding onto one another.
Einstein didn't really understand gravity correctly at all when he came up with his relativistic interpretations. He came up with those because of the curious orbital pattern of the closest planet to the Sun in our solar system: Mercury. Mercury's orbit has an orbit like a spirograph pattern, wherein its perihelion (its closest distance to the Sun as it orbits) is constantly changing each time it circles the Sun, which Einstein thought was caused by the relativistic type dynamics that he devised for explaining that. But the real cause of Mercury's unusual orbital pattern is Sun wobble, which Einstein and every other early physicist of his time knew nothing about--a solar feature that is now common knowledge. So once again the behavior of atoms and molecules, including celestial bodies, is distance sensitive so that while the Sun wobbles it is constantly moving from what would be that star's most central location, which constantly changes the side of the Sun that is closest to Mercury's perihelion which makes Mercury's orbital path respond accordingly.
Gravity is what causes objects to orbit sufficiently massive bodies by curving a straight or nearly straight path of an object and/or smaller celestial body, that flies by so that its velocity combines with its reciprocal attraction to that more massive body, which dynamics are then compromised together into a perpetual type orbit. If an object or celestial body come in toward a sufficiently massive body too directly the object and/or smaller body will collide with that larger body's surface and not orbit; thus it's assimilated into it. That means orbits, whether already slightly curved (due to another more distant gravitational interaction), or else virtually straight, will gradually adjust so that they typically form a relatively stable orbital path, or in certain cases more irregular yet still perpetual type orbits.
Acids and bases are essentially expressions of what causes gravity as well: i.e. leftover attraction. Acids are generally smaller molecules that surround a material so that their leftover attraction attacks it at very close range, which can be strongly disruptive if the acid is a strong one. Bases are larger molecules that can't get as close due to their size when congregated in a liquid. But their leftover attraction is generally greater than those from acids; although the extra distance mollifies their attraction strength to some extent. The reason litmus paper turns purple instead of blue or red when you mix an acid with a base is because the most attractive side of the acid molecules is turned toward the most attractive sides of the base molecules so that they essentially stop attacking whatever other material they might be in contact with. It's not because of negative and positive charge wherein the mixed acids and bases would become neutral since negative charge doesn't really exist; only uncharged photons on up in small graduated levels (a total of 20) on up to the medium and then highest levels of positively charged photons. Meanwhile this system explains how photons get charged to different levels and that they can become uncharged again via the strong gravity of the largest black holes, particularly one source collection of photons, that periodically spews (once every several billion years) photons out into space in two opposite directions, which black hole resides in the center of where galaxies are making circular paths as they travel through space to eventually return to that enormous source collection since very significant (although low level at that distance) gravity is constantly reciprocated between that central black hole and those galaxies.
To explain all of these things there is no need to resort to those highly counterintuitive relativistic explanations, such as "warped" space or a "fabric" in space playing any role at all in how and why some bodies orbit others, which is a completely bogus concept. There is no need whatsoever to envision what have been termed "gravity wells" either--another erroneous explanation that tries to legitimize the notion of "warped space." Along with that, there is definitely no real basis to support the spurious conclusion that gravity waves exist, which for one thing is founded on the false idea that light waves are massless, which they are not as these charts also correct while they lay that out in the most detailed way imaginable. Photons are not massless nor do they need to be to do what they do in the universe each day. Wherefore, the contrivance of massless waves arose as a religious (ie. spiritual) oriented presupposition.
All Photons, Radio Units & Electrons; Titanium through Zinc
Configured; Why Carbon Dioxide and Methane are Greenhouse Gases; Battery Type Electricity Introduced via the Voltaic Pile
relative to Copper and Zinc
Completed Particle System with Table for Assigning Repel Scores;
How to View Magnified Atoms Attached to Cotton Fiber as well as
Water Molecules; Lateral Space Per unit Divisors Relative to Shell Surface Area for All Ten Potential Shells (six radio & four electron) ;
The Composition of a Proton and Neutron
Attraction and Repel Relationships between every Photon Encounter
%201600%20reso.jpg/:/)
Attraction Aggregate Coefficient with Divisor Table; also Size Conversions
and Various Explanations
%201600%20r.jpg/:/)
Gallium through Zirconium Configured; Dynamo, Battery Type and Static Electricity Explained, including Lightning; also Vapor Compression Refrigeration Revisited
%201600%20re.jpg/:/)
This diagram-explanation combination is about cold nucleosynthesis. As a nucleus begins to take its shape from whatever number of protons and neutrons are present in a small vicinity (before electrons can arrive and ward off further connections of such nucleons), since neutrons are the bad boys by having highly attracted interior to one another, yet higher repelling surfaces than protons have—all while protons have lower attracted interiors to one another, as well as lesser repelling surfaces, too—the neutrons present always try to attach first yet they can't because of those surfaces (as the tritium configuration indicates that its two neutrons would clap under those circumstances): the would-be attaching neutrons calm down as protons come in to intervene to allow solid connections. This means that there are always underlying spine neutrons within any configuration that has at least three neutrons in its center; all while there are many, many protons that serve as wedge protons intervening between any interior neutrons. Thus the rule: Neutrons in a configuration cannot touch or else their will be some form of generally those more common type radiation decays.
What's shown above is the differently charged photons emerging from a large black hole collection in the center of the universe where those not only collect but every galaxy made of them will eventually return to because of its immense gravity. Unlike the more uniform pattern for this cycle shown in the pencil sketch below, this depicts why it is actually so random even though it all does return to this source collection eventually. The photons periodically emerge from this giant black hole because of shape distortion, since being spheres they are compressed by this black hole into becoming more and more cube shaped the deeper those get buried within it. All of them that are compressed as such then flex back collectively trying to restore their far more natural spherical shape. Thus they emerge as two opposite side jets into space. Now since the highest charged white photons are strongly attracted to the uncharged black photons, the black photons--of which there are far, far more of those--chase down the white photons trying to attach to them; yet those they rebound off of them several times before such bonding between them can occur. This knocks the white photons off course from carrying on in more of a straightforward path. Since all of the other photons will eventually end up following what these highest and lowest charged photons start to make, that skews the direction the entire spew which ends up making its direction outward and away from the source collection very random.
The first one of these universe model pencil drawings appeared in my 2008 book, Endless Cycle Universe. The concept is a great one; but I soon learned that not only were the farthest galaxies away from us speeding up, but that some have been massively speeding up as they move on away from us. That caused me to alter, in this 2009 drawing, how that material (which included galaxies containing black holes, along with some stars and planets that some of which may not all be incorporated into those galactic black holes quite yet perhaps) races in toward this source collection, which changed how I drew the return pattern next to that source black hole—a black hole that greatly compresses its inner photons to the point that their shapes become more cube-like (than spherical) so that they push upon one another to eventually cause binary eruptions into space, i.e. eruptions of charged photons.
The writing of Endless Cycle Universe in 2008 marked this author's initial attempt to engage (or broach) the subject matter, or field, known as physics. I did so with three main hypotheses that were not yet accepted in science: (1) That every item, meaning everything, that exists in the entire universe, besides literal space—while literal space would be what should be called absolute emptiness between each object with mass that passes through such emptiness—all have mass; also (2) That such mediums with mass consist of digits (that should be called photons), which comprise all matter, whether single (as in individual) units on up to each composite that has greater mass by those connecting some number of those; as well as (3) That these photons range from no charge on up to high positive charge only, while there is no such thing as negative charge... all while contending that upon such a basis (or bases if you prefer) all scientific explanations should be founded on from now on, once this has been widely, and possibly even formally, adopted. When writing Endless Cycle Universe—which initiated these three integrally related theses, even though I was still a rank amateur when it came to science—this book did successfully launch these concepts, not as a literary success by any means; but rather as a way for me to launch into this subject matter as I started to explore this highly realistic possibility that no one else, as far as I know, had ever attempted. In doing so, when first trying to broach the topic of what all forms of radiation might be, in terms of their digits under this approach, as the rank amateur that I still was, some errors about some of the velocities of already well recognized forms of radiation were made by me—errors that didn't allow the concept to propagate in 2008 or 2009, as I first initiated the website with the domain: endlesscycleuniverse.com. However, by writing on such topic(s) via the early form of this that website, allowed me to move from studying one scientific topic into the next one, then on and on, as I made arguments that the above three theses were not only the correct approach but what truly exists also; which allowed me to invest some 20,000 hours of study in all of this, to afford me the ability to form arguments within a far more informed dialectic that's finally coalesced into what has become a fairly comprehensive collection of literature that can be freely accessed at a couple of locations on the web.
Meanwhile, the cost of doing this has been more loneliness than I would have wanted over the past eleven years, after having published Endless Cycle Universe in 2008 (which followed The Turning Tide, to initiate what I have been needing to do relative to religious subject matter), inasmuch as I feel that doing this is well worth it since it should end up benefiting many who still have had no idea how to view such matters, to then all too often end up caving into pressure applied to them from specious, as well as utterly manufactured, religious faiths.
A note to keep in mind regarding much of this: When a person was growing up, one who has been taught to adopt some form of religious faith as trustworthy, and then that person commits to that faith—not merely as a life business proposition or occupation (which is what nearly all who become ministers actually do since they are unknowingly taught to adopt that pattern at advanced learning institutions in that field), but as an actual endeavor in truth seeking relative to life and our existence; and then that said person finds out the long and the hard way that such faith isn't really true in a number of important respects, then that person must almost totally reconfigure his or her own view of most everything, if they care about what is actually real and true. In that kind of case, such a person will by that be flung toward the scientific community for answers, where he or she may, nevertheless, find some possible problems there as well while they are trying to reboot. Therefore, almost everything can become suspect as the person starts over trying to find the best way that he or she should take from now on; not just philosophically but with regard to how to approach all kinds of scientific topics as well, instead of simply adopting every single approach or item that's routinely taught at a higher leaning institution with regard to the broad field of science in general. So that person, due to their rough road experienced by having seriously adopted religious faith early on, but then being severely disappointed with that (as a guinea pig in some respects), will likely establish his or her own set of basic principles for the treatment of most any subject matter, rather than simply parroting what may be taught to them by any “official” source of information. That person will likely begin to weigh each thing that is taught to him or her for themselves, because in this case this is not simply about obtaining credentials for some kind of well-paying position, but rather about becoming a sort of actuary in some sense, one might call this.
A note here about Christian/Jewish Bible prophecy: Isaiah 13:9-10 and 19-20 (also Jeremiah 25: 11-12) assert (as if divinely) that Babylon (the place where the Jews were once held captives for several decades) would one day be made desolate (i.e. without inhabitants); that "Babylon, the glory of kingdoms... shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah" (from Isaiah: 13-19-20, which also says "it shall never be inhabited." But what really happened following the time when such "divine" prophecies were written was that Babylon's population reached some 240,000 persons 200 years later. It was, however, gradually abandoned over time because the Euphrates river channel moved several miles away. Another key Bible prophecy is found in Daniel 9:24-27, where the coming destruction of Jerusalem--i.e. the "city and sanctuary--is shown as being foretold; which capsule also presents Jesus as the Jew's Messiah per the theological accomplishments by his coming along with allusions to his sacrificial death. Those, accomplishments, by the way, sound extremely Pauline, which is one of several reasons why I believe Daniel 9 (at least verses 24-27) were first composed well after Jesus' death during the first century CE and then added into some new scrolls of the Book of Daniel by the Essenes in Qumran (who were the caretakers of the Book of Daniel along with several other Bible books). Anyway, several different Dead Sea Scroll texts were dated with radiocarbon dating by VanderKam and Flint in 1950, from which they concluded that most of those dated to around 33 CE with a window of variation being some 200 years earlier or possibly later. Since then, especially since 2020, since that dating done in 1950 would end up discrediting the entire Christin Religion along with its enormous funding and power over so many people yet today, new dating work was recently done by Christian backed groups, which now alleges that all of the scrolls date before 160 BCE, even though we know quite well that the scribes at Qumran were creating new scrolls of books like Daniel in the first century CE. In fact, some dating has suggested that certain texts date as late as the second century CE. Even so, when the Roman Empire overthrew Jerusalem in 70 CE under Titus' leadership those who lived in Qumran may have not been been killed after all. If so, any survivors who lived in that villa at that time would have carried on their scroll copying practice for at least a few more decades after 70 CE.
As a Christian you never learn anything from anything that happens. For if something fortuitous happens then “God did it.” Whereas if something unpleasant happens then he let you be tested for your own good (per what the Book of James presents regarding that). Abrahamic religions are strategies to civilize humans by use of fiction; also to give a clerical class domination while it enriches itself.