Eternal Universe System of uncreated Digits forces Them into a pattern of Recycling
Welcome
Materialist Particle System and Atom Model
where the digits are photons with mass
An Intuitive Interpretation of Atoms and Matter
A note here about Christian/Jewish Bible prophecy: Isaiah 13:9-10 and 19-20 (also Jeremiah 25: 11-12) assert (as if divinely) that Babylon (the place where the Jews were once held captives for several decades) would one day be made desolate (i.e. without inhabitants); that "Babylon, the glory of kingdoms... shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah" (from Isaiah: 13-19-20, which also says "it shall never be inhabited." But what really happened following the time when such "divine" prophecies were written was that Babylon's population reached some 240,000 persons 200 years later. It was, however, gradually abandoned over time because the Euphrates river channel moved several miles away. Another key Bible prophecy is found in Daniel 9:24-27, where the coming destruction of Jerusalem--i.e. the "city and sanctuary--is shown as being foretold; which capsule also presents Jesus as the Jew's Messiah per the theological accomplishments by his coming along with allusions to his sacrificial death. Those, accomplishments, by the way, sound extremely Pauline, which is one of several reasons why I believe Daniel 9 (at least verses 24-27) were first composed well after Jesus' death during the first century CE and then added into some new scrolls of the Book of Daniel by the Essenes in Qumran (who were the caretakers of the Book of Daniel along with several other Bible books). Anyway, several different Dead Sea Scroll texts were dated with radiocarbon dating by VanderKam and Flint in 1950, from which they concluded that most of those dated to around 33 CE with a window of variation being some 200 years earlier or possibly later. Since then, especially since 2020, since that dating done in 1950 would end up discrediting the entire Christin Religion along with its enormous funding and power over so many people yet today, new dating work was recently done by Christian backed groups, which now alleges that all of the scrolls date before 160 BCE, even though we know quite well that the scribes at Qumran were creating new scrolls of books like Daniel in the first century CE. In fact, some dating has suggested that certain texts date as late as the second century CE. Even so, when the Roman Empire overthrew Jerusalem in 70 CE under Titus' leadership those who lived in Qumran may have not been been killed after all. If so, any survivors who lived in that villa at that time would have carried on their scroll copying practice for at least a few more decades after 70 CE.
As a Christian you never learn anything from anything that happens. For if something fortuitous happens then “God did it.” Whereas if something unpleasant happens then he let you be tested for your own good (per what the Book of James presents regarding that). Abrahamic religions are strategies to civilize humans by use of fiction; also to give a clerical class domination while it enriches itself.
Latest Work on the Following 11charts that are listed as various front and back sides:
I'm improving Vanadium through Zinc right now. Titanium has now been massively improved by using the Boron frame at its nucleus center. After double checking phosphorus and sulfur I realized those had to totally reworked, which was done over the past few days. The inner shell of chlorine had to be expanded as well, even as notes have been added to explain why. The sodium chloride molecule, as it looks when suspended in water, now appears at the bottom of the Second Installment chart (front side). A new explanation about why brass resists corrosion so well was added next to the new zinc configuration on 6/24/26.Copper and zinc have now been configured (6/23/26). Cobalt and nickel have now been completed (6/20/26). Iron-56 has now been configured properly along with all of my now completed magnetism explanations laid out for public perusal. Manganese has now been configured using the magnesium frame and fits all of its notable properties, including the material's hardness ranking along with how and why allotropic changes occur when heating the element. Vanadium and chromium were both totally reworked using the boron frame since nothing else would work to get those atoms to score strong enough to match their Mohs hardness rankings. Titanium has now been properly configured along with its specs all calculated as seen in the second Installment front side (posted on 6/7/26). A section has now been added to the Sixth Installment front (on 6/5/26) about fusion reactors. The second half of that section, where the first sentence of that second half starts with "After further reading," the fusion reactor explanation customarily given now, after breaking down its details relative to what's known and has been documented according to careful particle physics, the fusion of nucleons from smaller atoms into larger atoms--which occurs in the plasma and not in the targeted lithium outer covering where the heating of the water to generate electricity must occur--isn't produced by the fusion of atoms after all, but from the leftover neutrons passing through the surrounding magnetic field after the deuterium and the tritium nucleons reassemble into helium-4 nuclei within that toroidal shaped circulating plasma, once again not in that lithium outer covering. The Fourth Installment front side has been fully edited while also doing final proofreading on 6/3/26. The Attraction and Repel Table has also had a note of clarification added about higher positive incremental increases starting with green-yellow-green photons through white photons; even as magnitude increases in charge get progressively higher between the steps up in charge. Side two of the First Installment is now finished (as of 5/31/26), as everything has been checked, redrawn and rewritten. Please check the black text paragraph toward the bottom right that explains what really causes shells around nuclei to form instead of the strong force / weak force inadequate pretense that quantum mechanics has been using for far too long now. As of 5/29/26, scandium has now been updated to the only nucleus that will work for 45 nucleons, that has 100% abundance, also that scores like a semi-hard solid--one that also combusts like phosphorus, potassium, fluorine, sodium and of course oxygen. As of 5/28/26, Calcium has been updated and vastly improved. As of 5/27/26, Potassium, it turns out is an oxygen frame nucleus, which everything about that configuration is completely updated now. Argon, as of 5/26/26, is now updated. I came to the realization, due to scoring the AAs for phosphorus, that the oxygen frame will continue to have larger atoms built upon it , apparently without limitation, once I realized how to keep building on it according to the rules of this system for building nuclei. Once phosphorus was completed it was inevitable that chlorine-35 would have to be another oxygen frame nucleus, which worked out wonderfully on 5-24 and 5-25 of 2026. Sulfur was vastly improved recently. As of Wednesday, May 13th, the white light/prism explanation has now been edited and expanded on the front side of the Fourth Installment. Also on Wednesday, Relativity has been debunked by showing how the Michelson-Morley experiment resulted in some mistaken conclusions, which is just above the Fourth Installment's white light diagram. Then at the top of the front side of the Fifth Installment, the two ways to debunk Relativity has now been clearly laid out. A now very detailed diode explanation, along with a detailed explanation of white phosphorus chemiluminescence, have now been written and can also be read on the front side of the Fourth Installment chart. I recently updated the water molecule as well. The water molecule explanation has really come together now. Please take a look at that, with the now much better water molecule diagram located at the top right of the First Installment chart's front side. There is also a new combustion explanation relative to how that process creates water molecules, which is located at the top of the Fifth Installment chart's front side. Magnesium and Aluminium have now been updated: redrawn (especially both element nuclei in the west side view), also recalculated; whereas both now have AA scores that very well match their well known properties.
First Installment, Second Edition (front side of chart)
First Installment, Second Edition (back side of chart)
Relativity Grossly misinterpretS Gravity
Gravity is what holds Atoms together
Gravity is constantly demonstrated for us on Earth in these everyday and quite ordinary ways. Water makes a droplet because the leftover attraction from its small molecules mildly reaches out reciprocally to join together several water molecules so that they clump together. The same sort of thing happens to cause water vapor to form clouds instead of them remaining diffused and separate in the atmosphere. Also, cooling water molecules make their electron shells contract which makes the their leftover reciprocal attraction stronger since the space between the involved nuclei, molecule to molecule, is reduced by that; even as they so often condense together on the side of a cold object and/or turn into attached frost if the temperature is cold enough.
An elastic material like a rubber band also exhibits gravity. In that case the joined molecules making the solid material are joined together too tightly to behave as a liquid; while the attraction between each of them isn't strong enough to form a rigid solid. Thus they can be pulled apart and stretched while they attempt to keep holding onto one another.
Einstein didn't really understand gravity correctly at all when he came up with his relativistic interpretations. He came up with those because of the curious orbital pattern of the closest planet to the Sun in our solar system: Mercury. Mercury's orbit has an orbit like a spirograph pattern, wherein its perihelion (its closest distance to the Sun as it orbits) is constantly changing each time it circles the Sun, which Einstein thought was caused by the relativistic type dynamics that he devised for explaining that. But the real cause of Mercury's unusual orbital pattern is Sun wobble, which Einstein and every other early physicist of his time knew nothing about--a solar feature that is now common knowledge. So once again the behavior of atoms and molecules, including celestial bodies, is distance sensitive so that while the Sun wobbles it is constantly moving from what would be that star's most central location, which constantly changes the side of the Sun that is closest to Mercury's perihelion which makes Mercury's orbital path respond accordingly.
Gravity is what causes objects to orbit sufficiently massive bodies by curving a straight or nearly straight path of an object and/or smaller celestial body, that flies by so that its velocity combines with its reciprocal attraction to that more massive body, which dynamics are then compromised together into a perpetual type orbit. If an object or celestial body come in toward a sufficiently massive body too directly the object and/or smaller body will collide with that larger body's surface and not orbit; thus it's assimilated into it. That means orbits, whether already slightly curved (due to another more distant gravitational interaction), or else virtually straight, will gradually adjust so that they typically form a relatively stable orbital path, or in certain cases more irregular yet still perpetual type orbits.
Acids and bases are essentially expressions of what causes gravity as well: i.e. leftover attraction. Acids are generally smaller molecules that surround a material so that their leftover attraction attacks it at very close range, which can be strongly disruptive if the acid is a strong one. Bases are larger molecules that can't get as close due to their size when congregated in a liquid. But their leftover attraction is generally greater than those from acids; although the extra distance mollifies their attraction strength to some extent. The reason litmus paper turns purple instead of blue or red when you mix an acid with a base is because the most attractive side of the acid molecules is turned toward the most attractive sides of the base molecules so that they essentially stop attacking whatever other material they might be in contact with. It's not because of negative and positive charge wherein the mixed acids and bases would become neutral since negative charge doesn't really exist; only uncharged photons on up in small graduated levels (a total of 20) on up to the medium and then highest levels of positively charged photons. Meanwhile this system explains how photons get charged to different levels and that they can become uncharged again via the strong gravity of the largest black holes, particularly one source collection of photons, that periodically spews (once every several billion years) photons out into space in two opposite directions, which black hole resides in the center of where galaxies are making circular paths as they travel through space to eventually return to that enormous source collection since very significant (although low level at that distance) gravity is constantly reciprocated between that central black hole and those galaxies.
To explain all of these things there is no need to resort to those highly counterintuitive relativistic explanations, such as "warped" space or a "fabric" in space playing any role at all in how and why some bodies orbit others, which is a completely bogus concept. There is no need whatsoever to envision what have been termed "gravity wells" either--another erroneous explanation that tries to legitimize the notion of "warped space." Along with that, there is definitely no real basis to support the spurious conclusion that gravity waves exist, which for one thing is founded on the false idea that light waves are massless, which they are not as these charts also correct while they lay that out in the most detailed way imaginable. Photons are not massless nor do they need to be to do what they do in the universe each day. Wherefore, the contrivance of massless waves arose as a religious (ie. spiritual) oriented presupposition.
Second Installment (front side of the chart)
.jpg/:/rs=w:1240,cg:true,m)
Second Installment, Completed 20-digit Particle Sys. (back)
.jpg/:/rs=w:1240,cg:true,m)
Third Installment, Proton and Neutron (front side of chart)
Third Installment, Attraction and Repel Table (back side)
.jpg/:/rs=w:1240,cg:true,m)
Fourth Install., Attraction Aggregate Divisor Table (front)
.jpg/:/rs=w:1240,cg:true,m)
Fourth Installment, Large atom w/ electrons (back side)
Fifth Installment, Relativity Debunked (front side)
Fifth Installment, Molecules Page (back side)
Sixth Installment, Magnification Mechanics and Fusion Reactors (front side)
Why Galaxies Spread in an Eternal Matter System when Individual photons Periodically Erupt to Space
This diagram-explanation combination is about cold nucleosythesis. As a nucleus begins to take its shape from whatever number of protons and neutrons are present in a small vicinity (before electrons can arrive and ward off further connections of such nucleons), since neutrons are the bad boys by having highly attracted interior to one another, yet higher repelling surfaces than protons have—all while protons have lower attracted interiors to one another, as well as lesser repelling surfaces, too—the neutrons present always try to attach first yet they can't because of those surfaces (as the tritium configuration indicates that its two neutrons would clap under those circumstances): the would-be attaching neutrons calm down as protons come in to intervene to allow solid connections. This means that there are always underlying spine neutrons within any configuration that has at least three neutrons in its center; all while there are many, many protons that serve as wedge protons intervening between any interior neutrons. Thus the rule: Neutrons in a configuration cannot touch or else their will be some form of generally those more common type radiation decays.
About the Underlying Particle Mechanics in Electricity Relative to Single Phase and Three Phase
The diagram-explanation combination like this that appears in For the Sake of Civility assumed that readers might already understand the difference between DC and AC current, many of which would: that DC current runs through conducting wire in one continuous direction; while AC generally reverses directions 60 times a second (in common 60 Hertz systems). In September of 2019, it was realized that a more in-depth explanation of AC vs DC, relative to their respective commutators, would be called for as well. This allowed for an introduction on how and why electricity flows from atom to atom according to this atom model, which description came in its present form, as presented here, while writing For the Sake of Civility. Yet at an earlier stage of this, as is mentioned in this website's blog about the 2014 atom model parameters explanation, it was hypothesized then that an electric photon layer resided next to every atom nucleus, which concept was abandoned since that wasn't conducive to easy electric current transfers; also because each nucleon is already covered with electric photons on their surfaces, which would negate the need for a special layer of those hovering next to a nucleus just under the first spherical radio particle shell. Yet even if some single photons did hover there, electricity would still flow for the reasons now given and operate as how that is now described.
An early pencil-sketch type drawing of the Eternal Universe Model that's been envisioned here (2009)
An early pencil-sketch type drawing of the Eternal Universe Model that's been envisioned here (2009)
An early pencil-sketch type drawing of the Eternal Universe Model that's been envisioned here (2009)
The first one of these universe model pencil drawings appeared in my 2008 book, Endless Cycle Universe. The concept is a great one; but I soon learned that not only were the farthest galaxies away from us speeding up, but that some have been massively speeding up as they move on away from us. That caused me to alter, in this 2009 drawing, how that material (which included galaxies containing black holes, along with some stars and planets that some of which may not all be incorporated into those galactic black holes quite yet perhaps) races in toward this source collection, which changed how I drew the return pattern next to that source black hole—a black hole that greatly compresses its inner photons to the point that their shapes become more cube-like (than spherical) so that they push upon one another to eventually cause binary eruptions into space, i.e. eruptions of charged photons.
The writing of Endless Cycle Universe in 2008 marked this author's initial attempt to engage (or broach) the subject matter, or field, known as physics. I did so with three main hypotheses that were not yet accepted in science: (1) That every item, meaning everything, that exists in the entire universe, besides literal space—while literal space would be what should be called absolute emptiness between each object with mass that passes through such emptiness—all have mass; also (2) That such mediums with mass consist of digits (that should be called photons), which comprise all matter, whether single (as in individual) units on up to each composite that has greater mass by those connecting some number of those; as well as (3) That these photons range from no charge on up to high positive charge only, while there is no such thing as negative charge... all while contending that upon such a basis (or bases if you prefer) all scientific explanations should be founded on from now on, once this has been widely, and possibly even formally, adopted. When writing Endless Cycle Universe—which initiated these three integrally related theses, even though I was still a rank amateur when it came to science—this book did successfully launch these concepts, not as a literary success by any means; but rather as a way for me to launch into this subject matter as I started to explore this highly realistic possibility that no one else, as far as I know, had ever attempted. In doing so, when first trying to broach the topic of what all forms of radiation might be, in terms of their digits under this approach, as the rank amateur that I still was, some errors about some of the velocities of already well recognized forms of radiation were made by me—errors that didn't allow the concept to propagate in 2008 or 2009, as I first initiated the website with the domain: endlesscycleuniverse.com. However, by writing on such topic(s) via the early form of this that website, allowed me to move from studying one scientific topic into the next one, then on and on, as I made arguments that the above three theses were not only the correct approach but what truly exists also; which allowed me to invest some 20,000 hours of study in all of this, to afford me the ability to form arguments within a far more informed dialectic that's finally coalesced into what has become a fairly comprehensive collection of literature that can be freely accessed at a couple of locations on the web.
Meanwhile, the cost of doing this has been more loneliness than I would have wanted over the past eleven years, after having published Endless Cycle Universe in 2008 (which followed The Turning Tide, to initiate what I have been needing to do relative to religious subject matter), inasmuch as I feel that doing this is well worth it since it should end up benefiting many who still have had no idea how to view such matters, to then all too often end up caving into pressure applied to them from specious, as well as utterly manufactured, religious faiths.
Suggestions came in 2014 on what this is: Likely a small black hole drifting along after a supernova
An early pencil-sketch type drawing of the Eternal Universe Model that's been envisioned here (2009)
An early pencil-sketch type drawing of the Eternal Universe Model that's been envisioned here (2009)
A note to keep in mind regarding much of this: When a person was growing up, one who has been taught to adopt some form of religious faith as trustworthy, and then that person commits to that faith—not merely as a life business proposition or occupation (which is what nearly all who become ministers actually do since they are unknowingly taught to adopt that pattern at advanced learning institutions in that field), but as an actual endeavor in truth seeking relative to life and our existence; and then that said person finds out the long and the hard way that such faith isn't really true in a number of important respects, then that person must almost totally reconfigure his or her own view of most everything, if they care about what is actually real and true. In that kind of case, such a person will by that be flung toward the scientific community for answers, where he or she may, nevertheless, find some possible problems there as well while they are trying to reboot. Therefore, almost everything can become suspect as the person starts over trying to find the best way that he or she should take from now on; not just philosophically but with regard to how to approach all kinds of scientific topics as well, instead of simply adopting every single approach or item that's routinely taught at a higher leaning institution with regard to the broad field of science in general. So that person, due to their rough road experienced by having seriously adopted religious faith early on, but then being severely disappointed with that (as a guinea pig in some respects), will likely establish his or her own set of basic principles for the treatment of most any subject matter, rather than simply parroting what may be taught to them by any “official” source of information. That person will likely begin to weigh each thing that is taught to him or her for themselves, because in this case this is not simply about obtaining credentials for some kind of well-paying position, but rather about becoming a sort of actuary in some sense, one might call this.
Another Eternal Matter Universe System Depiction (2014), that includes some particle explanations
Another Eternal Matter Universe System Depiction (2014), that includes some particle explanations
Another Eternal Matter Universe System Depiction (2014), that includes some particle explanations
In 2016, it was finally realized what causes galaxies to spread apart as they cross out into space after having come from a central collection, from which their photons had been spewed. That is explained in one of the diagrams to the left and three rows above this one. Once that has been realized as the cause, then no other cause needs to be explored. That results in a very random course for all of the galaxies to take, which by the way all of them eventually turn back, due to gravity, and head back toward the collection they came from. That means a nice organized loop of galaxies turning and returning, like what has been shown so far in all of these universe model drawings, isn't the real pattern since it's not nearly as clean as that; though those do, however, all turn around and return.
Lower (picture portion) of a diag./explan. combo in Existence Uniformity about GPS and Relativity
Another Eternal Matter Universe System Depiction (2014), that includes some particle explanations
Another Eternal Matter Universe System Depiction (2014), that includes some particle explanations
Considered here massively important to discrediting Relativity from being both real or necessary, this page has now been included in the blog portion of this website, among the earliest of those that appear on its Home Page. For when you do the math, the tolerances for small variations in each measurement taken by GPS is greater than the impact that the daily adjustments said to be factored in for "relativistic effects'" thus it actually has no affect on the time allotted per each 1/10th second radio wave transmission. That means that saying that applying Relativity to GPS confirms the theory is a genuine phenomenon of nature relative to orbits, including various transmissions of electromagnetic radiation, is actually the opposite; and should be treated as superfluous, to the point of even being misleading to our understanding the true dynamics involved.